Write, plan, collaborate, and get organized. Notion is all you need — in one tool.
Original: https://www.notion.so/
Write, plan, collaborate, and get organized. Notion is all you need — in one tool.
Original: https://www.notion.so/
Slack’s success has always been a bit surprising because it’s facing off against giants like Microsoft, Facebook, Google, Cisco, Salesforce and many others, all gunning for this upstart’s market. In fact, Microsoft is giving Teams away for free to Office 365 customers. You could say it’s hard to compete with free, yet Slack continues to hold its own (and also offers a free version, for the record).
Having lots of features is one thing, winning adoption is another. Microsoft lacked a unifying piece that would integrate these various elements into a form that users could easily embrace. Teams is that piece. Introduced in March 2017, I initially thought there was nothing much to it: just a new user interface for existing features like SharePoint sites and Office 365/Exchange groups, with yet another business messaging service alongside Skype for Business and Yammer.
Five more nourishing morsels I’ve spotted this week:
These have mostly all been tweeted during the week, and you can find everything I’ve found interesting and bookmarked here.
I have always said that the first step to real collaboration, as opposed to just having a shared space to stick your unreadable documents, is having the self awareness, the humility, and the courage to admit that you need help.
Too right!
Back when I was a local government officer, I used to be involved in things like local strategic partnerships – only the first word was, I think, accurate.
Anyway, various ‘delivery partners’ would turn up to a meeting, pledge to do something collaborative – i.e. something they were going to do anyway – and then go off and do it on their own, as they always would have done. Three months later, this activity would be announced at the result of partnership working and collaboration.
Am sure everyone reading this will have seen this happening, and as Euan says, no file sharing platform is going to fix this.
Instead, a sensible collaboration conversation ought to look like this:
I found LocalGovCamp a really refreshing and cheering event this year. I’m going to spend a few quick posts writing up my thoughts.
Mary McKenna brilliantly facilitated an excellent discussion on collaboration – why it is needed, why it hasn’t worked that well up to now, and how that might be fixed.
Some great input came from FutureGov‘s Dom Campbell, who spoke about the some of the challenges trying to implement their Patchwork tool across multiple agencies.
There was also discussion of the limitations of the traditional approach to partnership working – overly bureaucratic, slow to make decisions, agencies working individually to deliver what should be shared objectives, really boring meetings, and so on.
What’s needed is a more agile, responsive and flexible approach to working in partnership to deliver shared outcomes.
This needs to mean organisations sharing people, resources, systems, data and more – and not just tick-box style partnerships.
What’s also vital to to this working are grown up conversations are needed about who can deliver what with the resources they have. This is no time for pride.
SyncSpace looks like a fun, useful app:
SyncSpace provides a zoomable drawing space that can be sketched on by multiple collaborators, at any time, over the net. No files to send around, no versions to worry about. You’re all sharing the same whiteboard!
I find this stuff so you don’t have to:
Sometimes to make collaboration work you need to set some ground rules.
It’s easy to say, “let’s start up a google doc!” – and imagine everyone leaping in to give their ideas. But it’s not so simple as that, especially if folk haven’t had the experience or confidence in this way of working.
Instead it’s necessary to have a think about how the collaborative activity might be approached, and ensure everyone is aware of the process you have selected.
Often this will be the case when the technology available is a bit lacking. As an example, a recent collaborative effort I started was based in a ‘Note’ within a group on Yammer. Notes are the collaborative writing part of Yammer, but they aren’t terribly sophisticated and won’t allow you to use formatting such as tables.
So, I spent a bit of time describing how to add ideas to the list. I came up with a fairly simple process that involved a bold heading for each new item, with two bullets points underneath for other related information to be recorded.
Without this introduction, people may have been unsure what to do, and so not bother, or even accidentally start hacking up what others had written.
At the very least, when working on a Google Doc with others, for example, I’ll put “No deletions!” at the top as a general rule to people.
Any other collaboration ground rule tips to share?
I find this stuff so you don’t have to: